RadioactveChimp
04-16 01:52 AM
alright sorry man. I got an idea, why don't you make one with just link, that would be nice :thumb:
wallpaper tattoo Big Sean big sean album
Dhundhun
04-24 02:54 PM
I got one more LUD for I-485
ie., I got One on Mar 18th and the othe LUD on Mar 25. What dows this mean.
Can somebody clarify...
It seems that whenever they open file a LUD is generated, e.g.
..FP done
..FP Oked
..I sent docs for e-filed EAD, when they received they put a LUD
Soft LUD is happening amounts to some activity happening with file/case.
ie., I got One on Mar 18th and the othe LUD on Mar 25. What dows this mean.
Can somebody clarify...
It seems that whenever they open file a LUD is generated, e.g.
..FP done
..FP Oked
..I sent docs for e-filed EAD, when they received they put a LUD
Soft LUD is happening amounts to some activity happening with file/case.
belmontboy
09-21 05:53 PM
I think you are talking about Pre-Adjudication.
There are numerous threads on this forum. Check out them
There are numerous threads on this forum. Check out them
2011 Big Sean Covers Coast To Coast
jliechty
January 3rd, 2005, 06:19 PM
Wow, very interesting. Though I might experiment with cropping (first try would be cutting off the bottom, including the one bird down there, to make it more panoramic and [hopefully] make the horizon less centered), there's not really anything that I'd change about this photo. Good work, IMHO. :)
more...
STAmisha
06-23 08:15 PM
I have a very unique problem.
I'm filing 140 and 485 now with my current company (company B). I came to USA in Sep 2000 via company A. I joined current company in May 2003. I did not resign from company A till July 2003 ( was on vacation from company A and got paid).I also got experience letter from company A saying that I worked from Sep 2000 to july 2003
Now in my biographic forms should I declare that I worked in company A from Sep 2000 to May 2003 (or) Sep 2000 to July 2003?
If I put Sep 2000 - July 2003, will I be in a problem? Please advice
Also, I LC just got approved from P-BEC. We dont have the physical copy yet. can we file 140 and 485 without it?
I'm filing 140 and 485 now with my current company (company B). I came to USA in Sep 2000 via company A. I joined current company in May 2003. I did not resign from company A till July 2003 ( was on vacation from company A and got paid).I also got experience letter from company A saying that I worked from Sep 2000 to july 2003
Now in my biographic forms should I declare that I worked in company A from Sep 2000 to May 2003 (or) Sep 2000 to July 2003?
If I put Sep 2000 - July 2003, will I be in a problem? Please advice
Also, I LC just got approved from P-BEC. We dont have the physical copy yet. can we file 140 and 485 without it?
sam_hoosier
04-07 11:19 AM
Just fillout a new I-9 form and give to your employer.
more...
new_horizon
01-02 03:01 PM
AFAIK those who filed after July 30, 2007 filed with the new fee, and do not have to pay the fee for the EAD. However you can't e-file, but have to send in your paper application form.
2010 CD release party April
chinta_ramesh
08-26 04:05 PM
Should be TRUE...as USCIS can use the SPILL OVER VISA # only in last month ...!!!
more...
MatsP
August 28th, 2009, 01:00 PM
I can't really help much, but I would say that going Canon won't actually help (unless you would be happy to use the Canon Digital Photo Professional tools, which is a simpler variant of lightroom, sort of).
New formats of RAW format always needs newer versions of software.
--
Mats
New formats of RAW format always needs newer versions of software.
--
Mats
hair and album release party
chanduv23
10-17 07:47 AM
There is a strong reason why we are urging people to join the State Chapters.
Please join your State Chapters and start getting active.
Please join your State Chapters and start getting active.
more...
Bobby Digital
November 17th, 2005, 10:56 AM
I have to agree that the back ground is a bit distracting, but the petal is a very cool shot. If this were my shot I would try a few things in Photoshop to change it up. Like maybe make the background black and try black and white? Something like that may add something to it. Just a thought. Don't give up on it there's something there it just has to be found-:)!!
hot Martinez beyonce Big Sean
kirupa
07-25 01:35 AM
Added!
more...
house Sean, however, is unsure that
rb_248
02-02 06:56 AM
Can somebody provode me list of H-1 sponsoring consultants in non-IT field?
What do you mean by non-IT? Be more specific.
What do you mean by non-IT? Be more specific.
tattoo 2010 after delay, Big Sean#39
Blog Feeds
05-05 06:40 AM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
It's H-1B season and the business immigration attorneys at Fong & Chun are busy once again fielding phone calls and inquiries regarding employment-based visas, including those of L-1 and new company visas. In the past few years, the USCIS and US Department of Labor have suspected newer and small companies of fraud, especially within the immigration system. New procedures and increased scrutiny (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2009/04/h1b-quota-still-open.html) of employment-based cases have made H-1B petitions and H-1B visas especially more difficult to attain.
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/Handshake.pngToday's Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703712504576242973187563498.html) ran a story about the very disturbing trend revealed by the Securities and Exchange Commission that small private companies are merging with public shell (dormant) companies instead of going through more rigorous methods of becoming public, avoiding initial public offerings. SEC Commissioner, Luis Aguilar announced that since January 2007, 600 of such "backdoor registrations" occurred and most notably, more than 150 of these occurred in and around China.
It's no secret that the USCIS, as part of the US Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) is engaged in "national security, fraud detection and prevention." The DHS now has an unit attached to it which investigates corporations suspected of defrauding the government specifically through the H-1B program and other visa categories. This has made adjudications of all H-1B applications much more difficult and I believe we will see strict review of all H-1B and work related applications. ---ecf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2011/04/chinese-companies-suspected-of.html)
It's H-1B season and the business immigration attorneys at Fong & Chun are busy once again fielding phone calls and inquiries regarding employment-based visas, including those of L-1 and new company visas. In the past few years, the USCIS and US Department of Labor have suspected newer and small companies of fraud, especially within the immigration system. New procedures and increased scrutiny (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2009/04/h1b-quota-still-open.html) of employment-based cases have made H-1B petitions and H-1B visas especially more difficult to attain.
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/Handshake.pngToday's Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703712504576242973187563498.html) ran a story about the very disturbing trend revealed by the Securities and Exchange Commission that small private companies are merging with public shell (dormant) companies instead of going through more rigorous methods of becoming public, avoiding initial public offerings. SEC Commissioner, Luis Aguilar announced that since January 2007, 600 of such "backdoor registrations" occurred and most notably, more than 150 of these occurred in and around China.
It's no secret that the USCIS, as part of the US Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) is engaged in "national security, fraud detection and prevention." The DHS now has an unit attached to it which investigates corporations suspected of defrauding the government specifically through the H-1B program and other visa categories. This has made adjudications of all H-1B applications much more difficult and I believe we will see strict review of all H-1B and work related applications. ---ecf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2011/04/chinese-companies-suspected-of.html)
more...
pictures Big Sean held an album
reddymjm
05-15 06:34 AM
If your I-140 gets approved when you are already in the sixth year, can you still seek the 3 year extension?
Yes U can.
Yes U can.
dresses Big Sean – So Much More (Prod.
NANO3
05-03 09:58 PM
:drool: nice!!
more...
makeup The official album release
cjgirish
02-06 02:13 PM
Hello All,
I am in a very sticky situation, my labor is pending @ PBEC with priority date of Jan'2004, which is Non-RIR and filed under EB3 category, based on which I have been getting incremental extensions of H1B (I am already in my 9th year by now). At present I am in the process of changing my filing type to RIR from TR and I was hoping to change the category too from EB3 to EB2, but my employers did not support me since they cannot pay the prevailing wage. I know I can still switch jobs, provided I transfer my H1B (which is valid till Jan�2008) and the new company files my GC immediately, so my questions to fellow victims of PBEC is
� How can I retain my old priority date?,
� Does the job descriptions filed with old labor have to match with job descriptions filed in PERM?
� It will be very tough, since I have almost 12+ yrs of exp in the industry, but my present employer is taking advantage of my situation and he is paying me peanuts, just because he does not want to pay me more, they have filed the papers as EB3. So while filing labor under EB2, can I still maintain my old priority date.
Please guys/gals help me out, I am not sure what to do, since I have already spent almost 3K$ on my GC and If I will be stuck with my employer at such low salary after my labor & I140 gets approved because of the retrogression it will be disaster. So I was thinking it would be better to be stuck with employer, who at least pays me decently and if I can retain my old dates it will awesome.
Regards,
CJG
I am in a very sticky situation, my labor is pending @ PBEC with priority date of Jan'2004, which is Non-RIR and filed under EB3 category, based on which I have been getting incremental extensions of H1B (I am already in my 9th year by now). At present I am in the process of changing my filing type to RIR from TR and I was hoping to change the category too from EB3 to EB2, but my employers did not support me since they cannot pay the prevailing wage. I know I can still switch jobs, provided I transfer my H1B (which is valid till Jan�2008) and the new company files my GC immediately, so my questions to fellow victims of PBEC is
� How can I retain my old priority date?,
� Does the job descriptions filed with old labor have to match with job descriptions filed in PERM?
� It will be very tough, since I have almost 12+ yrs of exp in the industry, but my present employer is taking advantage of my situation and he is paying me peanuts, just because he does not want to pay me more, they have filed the papers as EB3. So while filing labor under EB2, can I still maintain my old priority date.
Please guys/gals help me out, I am not sure what to do, since I have already spent almost 3K$ on my GC and If I will be stuck with my employer at such low salary after my labor & I140 gets approved because of the retrogression it will be disaster. So I was thinking it would be better to be stuck with employer, who at least pays me decently and if I can retain my old dates it will awesome.
Regards,
CJG
girlfriend Read Big Sean Album Reviews
lecter
December 14th, 2003, 08:28 AM
yep, it worked.. took a lousy picture and made it interesting....
love the effect!
Rob
love the effect!
Rob
hairstyles Famous release, Big Sean
trexx7
07-27 11:09 AM
Since Company A is for future Emp and I never worked for it. Can I still use AC21 and join Company B. Thanks once again
tdasara
03-06 04:03 PM
The use of H1b is extensive just to promote false news....
H1b and Greencards are used in the same context. Many 'technology' magazines don't like either GC's or H1b's.
GC process is a 'fair' atleast when it comes to prevailing wage and so they quote 'H1b' quite often to build up their case.
H1b and Greencards are used in the same context. Many 'technology' magazines don't like either GC's or H1b's.
GC process is a 'fair' atleast when it comes to prevailing wage and so they quote 'H1b' quite often to build up their case.
gjoe
10-28 08:03 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14937
Thanks
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment